the Nazca Monkey's head for connections to the Great Pyramid
the latest of tests exposing one geometrical system uniting three ancient
designs, each from a different continent. Some arcane prehistoric
"Agency") has had global reach over our planet and created art and architecture
as mathematical puzzles for the future generations:
monkey from the world renowned Nazca Lines, Peru
b) a 14,000
years old engraving from
the not so well-known grotto of La Marche, France
c) the three
great Giza pyramids
The elements in common to the three designs have differing
visibility; some leap up, others patiently await
discovery by the roundabout method. For instance, there was much about
the topography of
the head of "Athena", the human figure in the engraving from La
that I missed until getting back to it with
the Giza layout.
The Great Pyramid became closely associated with Athena's head ever since then.
the result, one symbolic meaning comes across clearly - the Great Pyramid was in the
mind of a Stone-Age
extrapolation, the young woman from the engraving had played a
major role in
the design stage of the three big pyramids. Her role in the
implementation stage, however, remains an open question, as does the
true age of
the three monuments. Otherwise, the pyramids would have to be at least
A star brings us together
ground plan of the three Giza pyramids sprawls almost one
kilometer from North to South; the monkey from Nazca spans nigh a hundred meters,
La Marche tangles its lines over a portable, A-4 sized stone
of the three works (the engraving, the pyramids, the
monkey) had gone through being a 5-pointed star in its embryonic stage; so it's nice to know that
can easily be scaled 1 : 1 : 1 and thusly laid over
each other for comparison. Hence we scale
the works, laid over each other, until their original
stars become identical.
That was the case in the preceding
between Giza's ground-plan and the engraving. If
to the engraving with Giza was so productive, is it not
the same experiment will also yield tangible results between the plan
and the monkey? The ideal
result would show rational relationships between the same elements,
i.e. the Great
Pyramid and the monkey's head. Let's check that daring
First, all three works are shown overlapped in the image below. The original
star is divided into left and right halves by
a central axis. Athena's head and the Great Pyramid are
to the left of that axis; the monkey's head is to the right, and is
away from the pyramid. Do we see any reasons for continued experimentantion?
is some duality on display
here: The heads are at approximately the same elevation; moreover, they
see eye-to-eye for Athena's right eye lies on the horizontal line with
the place where the monkey's right eye ought to be located. A star's
tip reaches into each head, as well.
these attributes are reflected across the stars vertical axis,
why don't we mirror the entire monkey across this axis to see what
happens? See the stunning result below: Athena's face is almost
one-hundred percent inside the monkey's face, and her right eye
now doubles as the monkey's right eye!
The discovery of such harmony prompts another experiment; without any rotation
whatsoever, we move
the monkey head over head with Athena to find the
best mutual fit:
could not have hoped for a better result - the fit is perfect! It looks
like the Agency had built in confirmation of our scaling procedure.
|Note the different orientation of the above image. It is
oriented to the second most important element in the geometric system
of each the monkey and Athena - the so called Square. My name for the
system is "Cone & Square".
illustration below, the Square is shown as a diamond. The lens inside the diamond is constructed from circles which
originate in the top and bottom corners of the Square.
also see the form of a pyramid within the lens; I've seen it there since the
beginning, along with some other things. I've reoriented the image to the Square to show the pyramid at the proper angle.
Also of note: a) the monkey's head is inserted right over the pyramid's apex
b) the monkey's hands, especially the left one, mesh remarkably
The illustration is also suitable to pointing out the conceptual
difference between Athena and the
monkey in how they express the Square.. While both are seen to
have a considerable degree of harmony
with the Square, only Athena puts it into plain sight and
allows accurate derivation of its size, orientation, and
position. The monkey conveys only the general directions of
its diagonals. The square in the monkey results from a loop-back to
Athena - copying in Athena & pasting in the monkey. Only then we
see how well it fits.
|Are any readers wondering at Athena's prone position? Shouldn't she be standing up just like the monkey?
I"ve always regarded the Athena engraving as a mandala, and
in this alternative orientation Athena can indeed be seen in an
upright stance. She is looking skywards, holding out the lens with the
pyramid inside. In my rendition, she is wearing a long,
tight fittting, yellow skirt, and a blue jacket. The scene's
symbolism is in agreement with the entire analysis. I'm not so sure
what to make of the fact that Athena also seems to be carrying the
monky on her back...
| Mirroring the pyramids
Mirroring of the monkey across the star's central axis brought us truly
interesting results. Why don't we try the same with the
reconstruction of the Giza plan? The process of reconstruction
starts to the left
of the star's axis, but it can also start to the right of the
axis. The end result will then be a mirror image, as seen below..
At this resolution, both the second pyramid's mirror-image and its
original are indistinguishable from each other.
The third pyramid, when reflected,
is off on the periphery, but one of the original's corners is
just five centimeters short (on the Giza-scale) of one of the
monkey's star lines (the long straight line running across the monkey's
Since lines at Nazca are several inches wide, this pyramid corner is
right on that line.
Of course, our main interest is in what happens between the Great
Pyramid's mirror image and the monkey's head. It is
encouraging to see right away that:
This pyramid is also partially positioned over the head of its subject.
The pyramid's axes run near the top and the right side of the head.
A diagonal of the pyramid divides the head into approximate halves.
The other diagonal, facing the pyramid, is clearly nigh as wide as
the head at this angle, as shown by parallel lines from the ends of the