|
Prehistoric
Science – Complex Mathematics Encrypted in Art |
The
Stone-Age engraving pictured here is not a free-hand drawing. It was
constructed to exact specifications with
revealing accuracy. If so, then this image would
be the most important one in humanity's possession. It
contains abundant proof that more than 14,000 years ago
someone had profound knowledge of Mathematics, and a method of encoding
exact ideas into Art.  The work comes across as constructionist, and modern once we get past its pseudo-naive facade, and past our own presumptions. Art can express ideas, and even exact ideas like this image, which has a hermetic level fully impregnated with mathematical meaning. As such it is cryptographic Science-Art with emphasis on the 'cryptographic' and 'science'. This engraving dramatically changed my perspective of prehistory. The young lady's portrait is so impressive in its science, it may be the portrait of an all-knowing goddess, hence the name Athena engraving. Unprecedented, it is precedent to many topics, some encountered throughout ages, and some modern. Once my research hit the vein of prehistoric mathematics in Magdalenian art, it became uniquely suited to recognition of the same vein elsewhere, in the layout of the Giza pyramids in Egypt, the adjoined temples there, engraved glyphics at the Abydos temple of Seti I, and Ramses II, or the giant glyph of a monkey from the Nazca Lines in Peru. This report covers a lot of ground and a long timeline. My suggestion is to start reading it from the most recent chapter - "Laying out the Great Giza Pyramids from a Line Segment." This chapter presents the clearest cut case in the report, conferring transparency onto essentials of the subject and the method. This case is also my offering to folks, who require academic credentials, or peer-reviewed publications before they pay attention - a bona-fide academic accomplishmennt, whose virtues may be objectively measured against the rest of the field. Whereas in previous cases my research was and still is a one-horse race, this last case is about a successful solution to a challenging problem, which has been worked on since 1883 by significant numbers of researchers from all over the world. Leading such a distinguished field to a convincing solution implies that despite fantastic circumstances my other research may be similarly valid. |
|
|
Laying Out the Great Giza Pyramids from a Line Segment
| Since 1883, the year Sir William Flinders Petrie published his
geodetic survey of
the three great Giza Pyramids, it has been analyzed for
geometric, and numeric significance. To show that
the three pyramids are parts of one overall plan, there have been attempts
to generate the layout of the three great pyramids from pure
ideas.
Giza abounds with inspiring relationships. But, to safely pin ideas on the designers, those have to be tested in redesigning of the plan, and found to
be compellingly accurate, if indeed the builders had
been capable of such accuracy. Since there is a number of
examples showcasing the knack of Giza builders for accuracy, such as
that found in the Grand Gallery, or in the total north-to-south
distance between the pyramids, our standard should be as demanding.
Here, it is time to mention John
Legon . Legon's reconstruction works with such accuracy along the east-west axis for lines passing through the east and west sides of the Second Pyramid, and the west side of the Third Pyramid. However, the north-to-south division produces a much bigger fault of 1.25 inches. Although Legon deems it completely accurate, why did the Egyptians not achieve comparable accuracy along this axis? This should be the warning sign that Legon's theory is too simple, because it uncovers a rather small, even if highly important, part of the overall solution. Be it as it may, it seems clear to me that Legon is correct, when stating that axial spacing between the pyramids approximates the square roots of the first five prime numbers, 1, 2, 3,5, 7, given in 250 x, and 1000 x multiples of cubits. In fact, his reconstruction comes so close to Petrie's plan that had I been familiar with it earlier, I might have accepted it, albeit reluctantly. That would be a disservice to the ancient builders, because Legon's interpretation puts them on a level everybody expects, i.e., they had a simple plan, and executed it somewhat unevenly. For this reason, I find it hard to understand, why Legon's theory does not get more attention and, or approval from the academy. Yet, I discovered a method of producing the plan of Giza by exact geometric construction, which complies perfectly to Petrie's measurements. This geometry bases on the secrets of Golden Section (Sacred Geometry), hence it is of the most appropriate type for sacred grounds like Giza. How glad will the skeptically leaning academy be to hear of it? I suspect, not very. In reaction, it will probably resort to embracing Legon's theory, as the simpler explanation. Please, read on, and see for yourself, how magnificiently the method works.  Giza Pyramid Temples & the Golden Section The pyramid temples are conspicuous by the inordinate quantity of golden rectangles in their layout. The Abydos Helicopter & the Golden Section Abydoská helikoptéra & Zlatý řez (author's Czech translation)  ©Bruce Rawles background photographed in November1992 The scene had caused some sensation in the nineties, but soon Egyptologists claimed to have identified at least two sets of overlapping hieroglyphics in this picture. This proffered a simple scientific explanation: What we see is a palimpsest, i.e., an accidental illusion. First there were some original glyphs, which were later hidden by plaster, and replaced by a set of different glyphs, engraved partially in stone and partially in plaster. Eventually, the plaster fell out, and the overlapping hieroglyphs began looking like images of modern craft.. With this simple explanation science seemed to have prevailed once again over sensationalism. The present scientific consensus depends on the assumption of Chaos as the ruling creative force behind the Abydos Helicopter scene. To thwart the consensus, one would have to prove that the fundamental nature of the glyphs is not subject to chaotic forces, but instead to rational order. Further testing then leads to one conclusion : The Abydos Helicopter scene is not a palimpsest, it is a design. Hesire's engraving & the Golden Section  |
|
Part 2 - The Nazca Monkey Report - The Seal of Atlantis |
|
......................................  The geometric creations within Athena's torso belong to the Square, the second part of the basic Cone & Square configuration. Here we see the “Pyrostar” configuration. Image boundary lines – the Frame Boundary lines form the simplest aspect of the image - the Frame. At the first glance, the thirteen whole numbers expressing distances between points of the Frame in millimeters - are random. Yet, if our goal were to show off advanced knowledge of Pi, Phi,and Equinoctial Precession, through just a set of a few numbers - then these numbers would be ideal choices, in ideal order. The Frame encodes the rate of equinoctial precession at par to our modern value. This fact suggests that this rate has not changed much at all since, quite contrary to the prevalent current opinion, all in all, a pretty valuable tidbit of information. It took modern instruments in the hands of scientists to arrive at this value. What did it take in prehistory? Equinoctial Precession - the Osiris Numbers - number 432  The Frame's Geometry a: The Hex-Machine – a family of three hexagons b: Two systematically related 5-pointed stars |
|
|
|
|
|
An
image cut-out from the site of Les Trois Fréres,
France, also dating back to the Magdalenian period of the Old
Stone Age.
|
|
I
took the liberty of reorienting Lwoff's drawing so the figure's feet
are firmly planted on the ground.
This way the stance looks natural.
Fostering love of mathematics is a calculated risk..
©
Jiri
Mruzek - Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Send me a few words. : mynammeatyahoodotcom
Discussion
Forum
