There are many signs worldwide that there was once an advanced civilisation that had long ago perished in some cataclysmic disaster. Material objects big and small, such as the Great Pyramid or fragile schist vases seem impossible to make without advanced technology. The notion finds strong support in many olden stories describing the use of technology sometimes surpassing what we have today, but the origin of those stories is attributed to their tellers unbound imagination.
Apparently, there is a lack of tangible proof, such as prehistoric power tools or scientific literature; and so it is understandable that the academy overwhelmingly accepts a basically linear version of world history with no room for advanced prehistoric technology, be it Atlantis or Ancient Astronauts.
But the present paradigm would have to change if it were to account for a discovery I count myself incredibly lucky to have made. It is very difficult to sum up here in a brief introduction because there are so many ways to do it that one doesn’t know where to start.

Advanced prehistoric technology really did exist. That means that there also was some society somewhere using that technology. As if it knew that its very existence will be in doubt in the future, the decision was taken to create lasting documentation capable of dispelling such doubt. That the truth be given a chance to prevail at some unspecified but critical moment in the future was obviously deemed important. But, by the same token, a different outcome — the truth remaining hidden —  was also given a fair chance.

The actual proof I found so far comes encoded in three parts. Each part is a stand-alone module which then adds up with the other two to a much greater coherent narrative — a trilogy —  a majestic scientific enterprise constituting an unassailable proof of the existence of advanced prehistoric science.To show that this society, or agency, was in global control of the Earth, the modules were distributed among South America, Europe and Africa. To suggest its stability and longevity, it had spread the evidence over the span of at least 12,000 years, if we are to trust our current dating of these artifacts. If so, this would imply that this once prehistoric agency was immune to any intervening catastrophes and may still exist parallely with our society.


Part 1 - Athena Engraving - the World's Most Important Picture

The discovery began with this Stone-Age engraving shown below. Despite appearances, it is not a free-hand drawing.. It is a direct standalone proof of profound knowledge of Mathematics, brilliantly encoded into Art more than 14,000 years ago. It is by far most formidable among the three components of the trilogy due to its complexity. Constructed from exact ideas with stunning accuracy, its complexity is so great that AI (artificial intelligence) is not out of question. It's either that or a super-intellect at work. 



The engraving's naive appearance camouflages a masterpiece of cryptographic Science-Art with heavy presence of Phi, the Golden Section, also known as the Divine Proportion. And so the young lady from the engraving fully deserves to be the namesake of goddess Athena. The engraving then is the Athena Engraving.
Just moments after I had first seen the image, I felt something in it whispering mysteriously at the thresholds of my perception. The art was so ancient, yet sophisticated; a portal into an adventure in a whole new world.
Eventually, my philosophical approach to art analysis had struck the vein of advanced prehistoric mathematics. Familiarity with the engraving's basic geometry, had positioned my efforts for an unexpected windfall _ the solution to "Nazca Monkey", the giant glyph of a monkey from the Nazca Lines, Peru. It became a low-hanging fruit, since it openly showcases  the same (basic) geometry.
Indeed, both Science-Art works stem from the same exact construction _ a shared template,  I dubbed poetically the Seal of Atlantis. The odds against such replication by accident are cosmic; therefore, Athena and the monkey must both be authored by one and the same agency (onwards - the Agency). Moreover, it is most likely that the conclusion extrapolates to the La Marche engravings and Nazca Lines in their entirety.

At that stage, my research results had acquired a unique status. They transcended being just more evidence and became an actual proof of advanced prehistoric science. With any 'mere' evidence, no matter how strong, there is always a chance that a different interpretation of it may yet be found. Proof is proof because it eliminates any possibility of finding another rational explanation for the evidence on hand.

This is the only case I know of in which we are able to methodically abstract bona fide coherent voluminous scientific thought from prehistoric media - encoded time capsules.

The discovery took on a new dimension when it turned out that the ground plan of the three great pyramids of Giza is incorporated in the Athena Engraving, where it plays a prominent role . Clearly, this development brings far reaching implications.

Years go by and the proof of prehistoric science I have made available is staying under the radar (summer 85 to June 23). Though facing exposure throughout that time to all kinds of gaslighting, and outright disapproval -- my confidence in the discovery's genuineness has only grown every time it added depth and scope. After all, I'm the one most familiar with it;  I know that I stuck with a methodical, rigorous approach; I was there for those magical 'heureka' moments, when the unexpected turned out real. So, yeah, I know..
Of course, I must accept some portion of blame for not breaking through, but I also see some external factors standing in the way -- cognitive dissonance in preconditioned, socially managed public, plus the expectable resistance by interests threatened by the proof.  For instance, my website had been blacklisted by Google's Safe Browsing Directory over a week ago. It was singled out from all those websites devoted to ancient mysteries, etc; so I take it as a sign that, at least in the eyes of some, my work is special, and suppression-worthy.

June 6. 2023_     Several days ago.  Google's Safe Browsing Advisory. which everything on the Internet seems to heed, began openly suppressing this website [i] Imagine my surprise when going to one of my pages on my favorite browser, up came an all red screen saying  Deceptive site ahead  Firefox blocked this page because it may trick you into doing something dangerous like installing software or revealing personal information like passwords or credit cards.

Of course, the accusation is totally false! Shame on you Google..

On the other hand, this act by Google may turn out to be blessing in disguise. People will wonder why Google all of a sudden does something so unprecedented as attacking a site entirely devoted to analysis of ancient art and artifacts for presence of mathematical design, After all, there are great many other sites devoted to the same subject: and no one ever tries to suppress them. What's going on? Who is afraid of what I discovered? Google's  sinister AI brain? That would be ridiculous!
Sure, my site may trick the reader into "doing something dangerous" like believing in the existence of advanced prehistoric science & technology. Google should act more responsibly; it should check out all accusations before acting on them. In this particular case, Google will eventually have to admit its wrongdoing.
June 21st, 2023: Just like that, Google stopped its blacklisting of my site. A letter of apology and an explanation would be appreciated, as well. What the hell was it all about?
 
                                   *
About the third part of the trilogy, the Giza ground plan solution, I would have never dared to tackle the problem since I knew that many great minds have been occupied with the Giza pyramids for centuries, and so I'd just be wasting time trying to contribute something new. But, my interest was sparked by a couple of successful (IMHO) forays into related problems, I had made.

First, the internet controversy over the so called Abydos Helicopter from the Abydos temple of Seti I and Ramses II caught my attention, and I thought that a geometric analysis was in order. It then indicated that these glyphs do not constitute a so called palimpsest, but instead, they are constructs of an exact nature at whose birth had stood the Golden Section. That gives credit to the idea the anomalous glyphs had been engraved essentially as we see them today, contrary to orthodox Egyptology.
The "Abydos Helicopter & the Golden Section" study provides compelling reasons why the official archaeological explanation _ the Palimpsest theory_ is plain wrong. For years it used to garner the attention of a steady stream of readers, on a couple of blue moons peaking in thousands of hits per day, until Google changed its algorithms. Instead of being in the top several search results, it is now pages and pages back, most likely labeled as pseudoscience.

                                       *



©Bruce Rawles background photographed in November1992 

The other foray resulted in ”Are the World's Biggest Building Blocks Prehistoric?”
The article cites multiple reasons why the famous Baalbek Trilithon wasn't built by Romans but rather much earlier, in prehistory. Even today, Rome is generally credited with moving the Trilithon blocks from the quarry some 900 meters distant to the site of Baalbek's Jupiter’s temple. I was able to dig up historical facts indicating that Romans could transport only stone blocks weighing no more than about 325 tons. So, the Trilithon blocks had to be moved in much earlier times and by technology superior to that of Rome. Forget putting the Trilithon blocks on wooden sledges and moving them over uneven and unpaved terrain _ despite the availability of capstan technology.

The modus operandi of the so called skeptics now maintains that there is no need for advanced technology to move blocks exceeding 1,000 metric tons in weight since the Russians had moved the 1,500 ton stone block named the “Thunder Stone” (Grom Kamen) to St Petersburg from a remote location without the use of modern technology. I checked the story out and found it deceptive.

The Thunder Stone - From 1,500 tons down to 400

Unlike Russians in the second half of the 18th century, Romans and their predecessors supposedly had no ball-bearings (cannon balls), steel rails, and metal sledges. Those things are all benefits of technology. One has to admire Falconet's engineering achievement; what he had proven was that technology of  the late 18th century was capable of transporting large megaliths.
Given the right conditions, this technology could probably move even much larger and heavier objects. Just scale everything up; use more steel tracks to distribute the weight, and put colossal objects on very large steel platforms riding on a great number of very large steel wheels. Hook it up to a system of capstans and pulleys for mechanical advantage, and then, using just our human power "alone", a small mob, or a herd of elephants, could definitely move the whole thing along. After all, it's documented that a single strongman can pull a Boeing 747, under the right conditions...  

                                   *
Eventually I confronted another controversy regarding ancient Egypt - Was there a common ground plan for the three great Giza pyramids? To my surprise, I was able to document that the ground plan, as surveyed by Petrie, can be derived from a specific version of constructing the regular five-pointed star. It was an astonishing development; the same method is heavily featured in the Athena Engraving, and it is the high point of the Nazca Monkey design!

The Exact Reconstruction of the Layout of the Great Giza Pyramids can be objectively weighed against the rest of the field. In other cases my research ran a one-horse race; here, it ventured into a problem, which has been worked on by many ever since 1883. I believe that my solution is a front runner. For one, it cannot be outdone in accuracy. What's more, it passes with flying colors the rigorous test of being projected onto the Athena Engraving to see if there is significant harmony between the two.  The test is possible because both works originate from the same construction of the five-pointed star. They are united by making their stars selfsame.